The war veteran’s barrister Arthur Moses SC began closing his Federal Court case on Monday, more than 100 days after commencing the proceedings against journalists and three mastheads.

Roberts-Smith is suing for defamation The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald and The Canberra Times over 2018 reports claiming he committed war crimes in Afghanistan including murder, and acts of bullying and domestic violence.

The 43-year-old denies all claims of wrongdoing, while the mastheads are defending them as true.

Moses submitted to Justice Anthony Besanko the oft-described trial of the century or proxy war crimes trial focused on three publications on June 9, 10, and August 11 in 2018.

“After publishing those articles the respondents have persisted in a campaign against Mr Roberts-Smith including allegations of murder,” Moses said.

He is seeking aggravated damages due to the allegations of six murders he either committed or was complicit in Afghanistan between 2006 and 2012.

Moses cited one allegation of shooting a 13 or 14-year-old boy as unjustified.

“The allegation is baseless and should not have been persisted with. Presumably it was persisted with in order to damage Mr Roberts-Smith in aid of the other allegations which have been propounded in this matter,” Moses said.

“This case is not about a path home to victory as the respondents have at one time described their case.

“But rather it is about the respondents using the processes of this court to make allegations of murder which will have both national and international repercussions for the applicant and other members of the Australian Defence Force who they have accused of murder.”

The most decorated Australian soldier was a “man with a high reputation for courage, skill and decency and soldiering, and had that reputation destroyed”.

His bravery was awarded with the prestigious and rare Victoria Cross, and consequently had an unexpected “target on his back”.

Moses said journalists Chris Masters and Nick McKenzie based their sensationalist publications on rumour, hearsay and contradictory accounts from jealous and obsessed former colleagues, including politician and former SAS officer Andrew Hastie.

The barrister denied the trial was an attack on press freedom or the right for Australians to know public interest information, but said such serious allegations must be proven beyond reasonable doubt.

“It is not good enough to point to the evidence and say we nearly got there.”

The closing submissions from both parties are expected to last eight days.

Lifeline 13 11 14

Open Arms 1800 011 046